Tuesday 29 March 2016

Why I’m not enlightened by religious tomes…Part-3

When Isa reached the Hawaris with his teachings, the poverty-stricken Hawaris requested that he bring them food from the skies. Something similar happened when Musa’s disciples, chased out by the Pharaoh, crossed the Nile River with him. After they’d done so, they made a similar request to Musa!
Those who have possess even a minimal amount of scientific knowledge, would certainly agree how absurd and ludicrous ‘food suddenly dropping out of the sky’ sounds.
We have now analysed the particulars of Isa’s birth. It’s time to turn our attentions towards the events leading up to his crucifixion,
“And remember, when Allah will say, oh Jesus! I will take you, pull you towards me, and save you from the Kafirs and make you pure. And those who listened to you and are remain grateful to you, I shall make them successful in every way over the non-believers, till the day of judgement. As a matter of fact: every one of you will have to return to me someday. And I shall resolve those matters, which you used to argue and debate about amongst yourselves.
As such, those who turned Kafir, I shall make life difficult for them on earth and nobody shall help them in afterlife.
In parallel, those brought Iman (faith) and did righteous deeds, will get what they deserve. And Allah does not love tyrants.
I recite all these Ayats (verses) and these clear directives for you.


Monday 28 March 2016

Religion: Women, a synonym for the ever-oppressed


Surah Nisa (4:15) says,
‘And if woman amongst who has been raped, you have to gather 4 men as eye witnesses to resolve their fate. If those men present questionable testimonies, then you must keep that woman in a room or enclosure until death comes for her or Allah himself provides a solution to her dilemma.’
Now in Islamic rules there is a clear law to seek out 4 male eye-witnesses, to prove a singular account of rape. And if the witnesses are women, then two women can be selected in place of one man. It goes without saying there is no place for medical ventures (like DNA testing amongst other medical tests) in amongst the Shariya laws.
The fact that a male witness is equivalent to two female witnesses, has been established clearly on Surah Bakara 2:281 of the Quran,
‘To the Mumins! Whenever you are engaged in some sort of exchange or barter or are loaning something to each other, make sure you document the transaction. Someone trustworthy amongst you may write it down; the writer will not refuse to write it down. He should write it down using whatever knowledge Allah has graced him with, and also the loan seeker must speak out his terms of the exchange fairly. He must always fear his Lord while he does that, and should make sure there are no discrepancies in the stated terms. If the loan seeker is illiterate or weak opr incapable of stating the terms of the exchange, then his guardian should fill in for him. Select two eye witnesses as well. If you cannot find two male representatives amongst you, then select one male and two females. If you like someone amongst the witnesses, make sure that if one of the witnesses forget something, the one whom you like reminds them instantly…’
It is noticeable that the inclusion of two male witnesses is adjudged to be favourable in these circumstances. In case they cannot find two male witnesses, it will suffice to replace one of them with two female witnesses. So as it stands, the testimony of women alone will not be considered valid in any way without the presence of a man. Now I wish to ask those who claim that the Quran only preaches equality among men and women, how you explain the discrimination and sexism bluntly staring at us? Researchers say that women are inferior in terms of their thinking capabilities, their ability to memorize things, their sense of judgement when compared to men. The above mentioned scenario has definitely contributed to such prejudiced assumptions.
In Islamic law, ‘Zena’ refers to lechery, maintaining illicit relationships during marriage, rape or prostitution. If a woman cannot prove through her eye-witnesses, that she was raped against her will, she has to be punished under the rules of ‘Zena’. That is Islamic law.
There was incident like that in Somalia a few days ago, where a 13 year old girl was executed by having stones thrown at her till she died. And it was carried out as part of a death sentence and was adjudged to be according to the appropriate ’Islamic’ laws. The Hadith bears many accounts of Prophet Muhammad utilizing the despicable method of ‘Razam’ (pelting someone with stones) throughout his life, to punish lecherous women. One of the examples is as follows –
Quoted from Hazrat As Shabani – ‘I asked Abdullah Bin Abu Aouf, “Did Allah’s Prophet ever apply the method of ‘Razam’ (pelting someone with stones) on anyone?” He answered, “Yes he did.” I asked him, “was it before Surah Nur was revealed or after?” He replied, “I don’t know.”
Hajrat Zabir Bin Abdullah Al-Ansari has quoted – “One of the men from the Bani Aslam tribe came to Prophet Muhammad and confessed four times to him, that he has entered into an illicit relationship with another woman’. The Prophet ordered to execute him by pelting him with stones, because he was married. I participated in the ‘stone throwing’ session as well. We began throwing stones at him from Musala. Unable to bear the relentless attacks, the man attempted to run and escape the hail of stones. We chased him till al-Hara and once we’d caught up with him, we managed to kill him eventually.” (Sahi Bukhari Sharif, volume 8, book no.82, no.805). That story was corroborated by Hazrat Abu Huraira in Hadith no.814.
Forget giving women the respect they deserve, they are shamefully stripped of all humanitarian rights even. They are punished severely if they do wrong in some way. On Sura Nahol – verse no. 43 (16:43), Surah Hajj verse no. 75 (22:75) Allah has clearly stated –
‘Women will never be made prophets”
Sura Yusuf, verse no. 109 (12:109) has a similar statement –
‘Those who have come before you were all men. I chose them from the society in general. I used to send Ohis (directions/instructions) to guide them’
There are many similar Hadith we know about. Even if a child comes across them, it will be as clear as day to him that Allah does not see women as equals of men. Islam is actually male-dominated and malevolent towards women. Hazrat Muhammad himself has uttered many time, “in my absence, I have not left that many harmful ‘Fitna’ or disasters for men in comparison to women.” (Bukhari Sharif, 205).
‘Always demonstrate friendly behaviour towards women, because they are made from the oblique bones of ribs. Try and straighten the bones in your chest and they will break. Leave them, and they will stay oblique.’ (Bukhari Sharif 205)
Although Islamic pundits tend to generally stress on ‘friendly behaviour’ part of it, the verse above is clearly implying that the character of a woman is as oblique as the ones on our chest.
 The definition of women in the Quran, compares women to fertile landscapes, ‘Your wives are only meant as cultivatable (to produce children) land for you. You are free to irrigate this land however way you want…’ (surah al-Baqara, 2:223).
And women are ordered to comply if her husband approaches her in bed. The Prophet had this to say on the matter –
‘If the husband calls for his wife to join him in bed and she does not comply (and the husband is left unsatisfied cause of that), all the angels shall condemn and curse her from dusk till dawn’ (Bokhari and Muslim).
In various Hadith, a woman is also instructed to shave her pubic hair, before her husband turns up home for the night after a long day,
The prophet has said – “If you wish to enter (your city) during the night (after a long day), do not enter your house immediately. Wait for your housewife to shave all her pubic hair and tend to all her unkempt hair as well.”
Furthermore, many Hadith also say that even if a woman is on the back of a camel or engaged in cooking, she still is forbidden to reject the sexual advances of her husband –
“If a man invites his wife to have sexual intercourse with him, she should comply to his request immediately, even if she is tending to the stove (busy cooking)” (Tirmizi).
Again, among most of the topics discussed, the ones which are professed to have at least a minimum amount of evil installed in them are: houses, women and horses. The prophet has even said that, the person who shares his secrets with a woman will never see the face of success. And if a nation elects a woman as its leader, it will never see the light of progress etc.’
But the prophet also didn’t forget to mention that even if she tends to all the desires of her husband, the fact that most women will still be condemned to hell is a given,
“Prophet Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam has said, whilst I visited heaven and stood at its gates, I understood that women would form the larger portion of the inhabitants here.” (Bokhari Sharif, 211)
Similar the derogation of women in the whole ‘witness fiasco’, the laws of inheritance too have a like for like impact. According to surah Nisa, “A female child is entitled to half of what a male child will inherit from their parents”. In the Quran (4:11) it is said that,
“Allah has given you instructions regarding your children: The portion of one man in the property is equal to the portion of two women. So if you have over two daughters, they will only be allocated two thirds of their originally calculated shares. If they die off or reject their shares and there is only one female child left, then she shall get half of that share. If that happens the rejected shares will be divided into six parts, and each (including the parents of the deceased) shall get a piece, if the deceased have only one son that is. If a couple do not have a son and they are the sole inheritors, then the mother shall receive one third of it (2/6 which is equal to 1/3). But if the deceased female children have a few brothers, the mother then shall only receive one sixth of the shares after clarifying the Wasiat (will), which will have created before they died or after they’d cleared all their debts. Between you brother and father you do not now who is your utmost beneficiary. These are things decided by Allah the most knowledgably, the most mysterious.”
In Bangladesh, Muslim family laws (1961) also state that a daughter is entitled to half of what a son is entitled to. It is evident that these laws were formulated using the Quran and Sunnah. Hence the glaring discriminations.
There are many ‘Muslim scholars’, who argue that because a woman grows up and inherits part of her husband’s property as well, she is rightfully entitled to a much more reduced portion of her father’s property. These arguments are quite simply bogus and haphazardly strung together. Nondini Hossain in her book “Purush Rochito Dhormey Bikolango Nari” has demonstrated excellent counteractive logic to address these discriminations,
‘women are capable of earning money in the modern age. Many earn more than their husbands even; they do have to wait for their husbands to provide for them. Many women are the CEOs or various companies, were prominent leaders in a nation or still are. These verses will definitely seem ludicrous and idiotic to them. And besides there are many women who never married or do not wish to. Also women have to grow up and they to have a ‘husband’ – when did that become absolutely compulsory?’
These things exist in all other religions more or less, not just Islam only. Take Hinduism for example. The main religious book for the Hindus is the Veda. That is why many refer to Hinduism as the Vedic religion as well. There are for main Vedas in Hinduism -  Jotha Righveda, Shamveda, Orthob veda and Jajurveda. The Jajurveda is divided into two major parts – which are the Krishnajajurveda or Toittorio Sanghita while the other one is Shuklojurveda; the Shuklojurveda is further divided into two parts – one is the Satpath Brahman while the other is the Brihadaronnok Uponishod. On the Satpath Brahman inside the Shuklojurveda, women have been compared in this way, “The person who owns more animals than he has women, will be considered as God (2/3/2/8)”. We found another verse later on which is a reflection on how women are rated in Hinduism, from a socio-economic perspective; Women should be controlled with canes and thunder/lightning, so that she cannot have any claims over her body nor her possessions” (3/3/2/13). What more is there to say? Won’t these shocking verses suffice? The Brihodaronnok Upanishad has saint Jagyobolko stating, “If a woman does not respond to her husband’s advances at first, the husband shall try and ‘buy her’ with gifts. If even that doesn’t work, the husband is permitted the use of canes to bend his wife to his wishes.” (6/4/7,1/9/2/14). The Devibhagvata describes a woman’s character with the following, “Women are like leeches. They suck the blood out of honest men. But foolish men do not understand this, because they give in to a woman’s incredible acting skills”.But denigration of women reaches its peak on the verses of the Manushonghita. Randip Bsau had this to say about it,
‘Out of the entire group of religious books available in this world, the one which is the most horrifyingly barbaric, listless, inhuman and full with deception, is the Manusriti or the Manushonghita in Hinduism.’
And he is quite right. According to Manu, women are lecherous by trade, lustful, vengeful, jealous and deceitful in nature etc. All in all, these are just some of the bad traits, from which women are borne from! For example on one of Manushonghita’s verses (2:213) it is stated that –
স্বভাব এষ নারীণাং নরাণামিহ্ দূষণম্।
অতোহর্থান্ন প্রমাদ্যন্তি প্রমদাসু বিপশ্চিতঃ।
Which roughly translates to,
“It is common nature for women to use their bodies to seduce and consequently intoxicate men and that is why, pundits never tie themselves down to marriage.”
And there are also verses like –
মাত্রা স্বস্রা দুহিত্রা বা না বিবিক্তাসনো ভবেৎ।
বলবানিন্দ্রিয়গ্রামো বিদ্বাংসমপি কর্ষতি।(2:215)”
“No man should seek to reside in deserted places with a woman, be it she is his mother, daughter or niece. Because they are clever enough and unstable enough, to sexually entice even the most knowledgeable of individuals. “
According to the Manushonghita women are only good for household jobs and bearing children (9:26).
Women were born to bear children and men were born to propagate women (9:96).
Women are sly, evil (9:18).
Women are forbidden to recite from religious books (2:66).
 If a man ‘feels bad’ for a woman he shall be condemned to the pits of hell (11:37).
In terms of marriage, women have been given clear directives on how to conduct themselves with their husbands –
বিশীলঃ কামবৃত্তো বা গুণৈর্বা পরিবর্জিতঃ ; উপচর্যঃ স্ত্রিয়া সাধ্ব্যা সততং দেববৎ পতিঃ॥ (5:158).
The verse translates to : Even if the husband is wicked in character, lazy and talentless, he still deserves to be treated like God by his wife.
If a woman is inattentive towards her husband or commits lechery, not only will she be shamed, but she shall also be riddled with diseases like tuberculosis and leprosy. Not only that, in her next life that woman shall be reborn from the womb of a jackal (5:163-164).
Only the women, who tend to their husbands properly, shall be allowed to enter heaven en (5:155).
A woman shall not engage in activities that will displease her husband, regardless of him being dead or alive and well (5:156).
“If her husband dies a woman is permitted to eat and drink till her body deteriorates, but is not permitted to pronounce the name of another man (5:517)”. And yet,
“If his wife dies, a man is permitted to remarry immediately after he has taken care of his wife’s cremation and other ceremonial duties (5:168)”.
Out of all the religious faiths surrounding us, the teachings of Buddhism are definitely the most noble, non-malignant and most progressive of all in my opinion. But Buddhists believe that Buddha has was also born  a few times before in this world in the form of humans or animals at times. And during each life, he gained immense knowledge and wisdom. Goutam Buddha used to preach the wisdom left by the previous ‘Buddhas’ to his disciple. He dubbed those those stories as Jatishmar, but later on they collectively came to be known as the ‘Jatok’. There is still a fair bit of debate surrounding which verses in the Jatok are actually Buddha’s own instructions, or which ones were remedied later. But what is beyond reasonable doubt is the overall attitude of the society in those times, towards women in general.
The way these verses have illustrated Buddhism in general, will surely perturb quite a few of the readers.
No. 536 on the Buddhashastra – is named ‘Kunal Jatak’. The main protagonist of this ‘Jatak’ is Kunal. These are verses where he discusses women in general. Kunal says women are not to be trusted, they are traitorous in nature. Women are not worthy of any kind of praise. Just as the Earth is meant for everyone, women are not fussed about who they commit lechery with. The following verses were pronounced by Kunal himself –
সদা রক্ত মাংস প্রিয়, কঠোর হৃদয়,
পঞ্চায়ুধ, ক্রূরমতি সিংহ দুরাশয়।
অতিলোভী, নিত্য প্রতিহিংসা পরায়ণ,
বধি অন্যে করে নিজ উদর পূরণ।
স্ত্রীজাতি তেমতি সর্বপাপের আবাস,
চরিত্রে তাহাদের কভু করো না বিশ্বাস।”
This can be roughly translated into: Kunal feels that men should never trust in the characters of women. According to Kunal, it is not enough to brand women as prostitutes or corrupt specimen. No, he feels women are something much more sinister. His verses roughly translates to,
-          Women reek like uncovered dumps of faeces
-          They are as evil as a poisonous Madeira
-          They are like two-tongued snakes
-          There mischievousness is as deep as the pits of Hell
-          They are impossible to satisfy much like ogres and monsters who always want to eat more
-          They consume everything like flames
-          They ‘flow’ everywhere like rivers
-          They go anywhere they wish like the wind
-          They excrete poison like poisonous trees
Kunal also had the following to say on why ‘women reek like uncovered dumps of faeces’,
“Women are like uncovered dumps of faeces. Flies are naturally attracted to these putrid dumps and it is difficult to stop them. But a wise or a knowledgeable person, is conscious enough to avoid going near these things. All in all there will always be men like flies who will jump onto the putrid haggis that is women, but a wise man shall always be able to smell the pungent odour of women and shall always be able to avoid them.”
Furthermore Kunal also had this to say in amongst his other doctrines. They roughly translate to,
“Volatile, poisonous, devious merchants
Those with horns like a deer’s, like two-tongued snakes
These are traits not different to women.
Dumps of faeces, pits of hell
Fearless monsters, carriers of death
They are no different than women.
Fire, water, air, land (who doesn’t care about their differences)
Or the trees which excrete poison
They are no different to women.”
And the grisly notes form the Jatak seem to continue forever but the gist of it is, ‘women are incapable of being saved’. On that note we found the story of a king, an avid believer of Buddhism of course, who regularly used to play Dices with his priests and win everytime. Before he used to make a move there was a song he’d hum. He claimed that it was because of the ‘honesty’ in the content of the song- that he wins every time. One of sections in the song roughly translate to –
“Women shall learn oppression and tyranny
I have no doubt that is how they behave anyway;
They see an opportunity, they jump at the chance to do something wrong
They are never attracted to religion.”
On the Durazan (Durgeyo)–Jatak, there is a small poem which roughly translates to –
“Even if a woman loves you, do not be fooled by that
And even if they don’t what difference does it make?
Who can understand what a woman is like?
They are like fish deep underwater, who can trace their paths?”
And this next one is sort of like a short story from the Onbhiroti-Jatak. This one is adamantly clear on the message it wants to convey. Translation:
“They traverse upon everything, the rivers, the roads, these are their homes,
Everyone has the right to traverse upon these places.
As such women are for everyone to consume (‘traverse upon’), because she is attracted towards evil deeds,
Those who know of her character, avoid her with complete awareness”.
And the list goes on. There is more on the Bidurpundit-Jatak if you want. Translation:
“Who can understand what women are like?
They are meek and spineless, that everyone knows.
You’ll burn and be consumed by the ferocity of their flames
Yet from top to bottom they are lovable, enticing.
The flames do not judge who or what they consume
Much like the love of a woman which is not very selective.
So avoid getting married and have a family
You are better off as a wandering saint, which is my best advice.”
One of the more noticeable examples of “goodwill” towards women was seen during the treatment of war prisoners. Islam says that for polygamous men, women are part of the spoils of war and are to be consumed as ‘objects of entertainment’ only. That is why war imprisoned women be it she is married, unmarried, widowed or a virgin, have been made Halal (religiously safe to use) for Islamic soldiers (Quran 4:28). If we cross reference the aforementioned verse, we will find countless examples strewn throughout Islamic history. Everyone from The Great Prophet, Hazrat Ali, Hazrat Osman, Hazarat Omar, have had ‘entertained’ themselves with war imprisoned women and sometimes, they have made them their wives. The Quran has a verse (4:28) dedicated to this, which roughly translates to  – ‘Those who are under your command (male or  female slaves, war imprisoned women) – Allah has made them valid for you (4:28)!’
Sure enough, we saw the instructions on these verses implemented without ambiguity, during the reign of Prophet Muhammad. From the biography of Ibn Sa’ad titled ‘Kitaab at Tabaaqat al Kabeer’, we learned that Muhammad conducted and concluded at least 74 ‘all-out assault’ wars (Gazwa in Arabic) during his lifetime. The 68 wars that were officially documented by Al-Tabarin his biography of Prophet Muhammad (the book is titled ‘Tarik al Rasul Wa al Mulluk’), are all ‘all-out assault’ wars save the battle of Uhud and Khondok. The first man to write Muhammad’s biography, Ibn ishak (book titled ‘Sirat Rasulallah’) stated,
‘After their defeat of the Bani Hawajin tribe, Muslims took 6,000 women and children as their prisoners. The women imprisoned from the war were allocated equally amongst the Muslim soldiers. Similarly on the April of year 627, during the raid on the Bani Quraiza, Prophet Muhammad picked out a beautiful war prisoner, a Jewish woman who went by the name of Raihana, for himself.
Another one who went by the name of Raita was nominated for Hazrat Ali, and Hazarat Oman was paired with a beautiful prisoner who went by the name of Joynab. It is said that Hazrat Omar meanwhile, left the one he was given for his beloved son Abdullah to consume. Apart from Raihana, there were two other female prisoners who were claimed and kept by Prophet Muhammad, Jawahira and Safia. Jawahira was imprisoned during the raid on the Banu Al-Mustalik tribe. Safia meanwhile was a casualty of the raid on the Banu nazir tribe in Khaybar.
There are some Hadith which have recorded Prophet Muhammad ordering a wife to be ‘consumed’ in front of her husband. When a few Sahabi’s chose to reject this command because some of the women had husbands who were still alive, Muhammad supplied, “even if she has a husband, her marriage is rendered obsolete after she is taken prisoner” (The Quran 4:28, Sahi Muslim – 8:3432).
Sahi Muslim, book no.8, hadith no. 3432:
Abu Said Al Khudri has said that during the battle of Hunayen, Allah’s prophet sent some soldiers to raid the Autash tribe. They met them face to face and a heated battle ensued. After their defeat of the Autash, the Muslim soldiers captured some prisoners. There were some sahabis amongst Rasulallah’s followers who were reluctant to take some of the women for their own, because their husbands were alive, but were known polytheists.”  And then the Great Allah decided to reveal a verse regarding this situation – “And married women are forbidden for you, but except those who are under your command (imprisonment).”
When Muhammad lived in poverty, and wasn’t as influential as he later becomes, decided to marry and start a family with Khadija. Khadija was 15 years older than Muhammad at the time of their marriage. But after Muhammad had achieved unprecedented financial success and started growing in influence, he started noticing young, attractive women around him. When Khadija died, Muhammad was 49 years old. From the age of 48 till the age he died 63, Muhammad had married 11 times in between. When he married Ayesha during that period, she was only 6 years old. Muhammad meanwhile was nearly 49. And besides, entranced by the beauty of Zaynab, wife of his adoptive son Zayed, Muhammad decided to marry her (at those times it wasn’t common practice to marry the wife of your adoptive son. But Muhammad ensured the beginning and continuity of this practice, by ‘making’ Allah reveal verses 33:4, 33:37 and 33:40 to fulfil his wishes). He also established a relationship with Maria, a slave girl gifted by Mukakis, Alexandria’s Christian ruler. Maria was made to be slave to Muhammad’s wife Hafsa. Maria’s illicit relationship with Muhammad (there is a story which claims that Muhammad lied to Hafsa in order to send her away to Omar’s house) served to anger Ayesha and Hafsa; his relationships with war prisoners Zuaria and safia also raised many questions. Muhammad became addicted to womanizing, whether he did it legally or illegally. His financial stability and growing power and influence were the main reasons behind this.
Now if my Hindu brothers are laughing their heads off at that, well, I’ve got bad news waiting for them too. I would like to recommend the ancient Hindu proverbs to those who think that a 50 year old man marrying a 6 year old girl, fall under the category of “sexual obscenities”. If Muhammad’s marriage of his adoptive son’s wife Zaynab is deemed as immoral, what do we make of Brahma’s advances towards his own daughter Sotorupa? The Matshopurna gives us the full story and it says, one day Brahma couldn’t contain himself watching his daughter Sotorupa. It is said that ancient Hindus were born from coitus between brahma and Sotorupa. It wasn’t just Brahma who was lewd with his own daughter. Usha was Projapoti’s daughter. Enthralled by her beauty and unable to contain himself, Projapoti expressed his desires to Usha. After that they both changed their forms and had coitus (Moitrayon Shonghita 4/2/22).
The ‘bhagvan’ Hindus pray to – has an obscene backstory behind his title. Even though God is referred to as Bhagvan, it is actually a notorious designation for one king Indra. He took the virginity of his teacher (master’s) wife Oholla, and his teacher in turn cursed him so that his body may sprout a thousand ‘Bhags’ (a woman’s vagina). Hence Indra was dubbed “Bhag-van”. The word ‘Bhagvan’ thus refers to Indra’s lechery only.
Every single one of the protagonists quoted in the Hindu religion, starting from Indra to Krishna were all lecherous. Bishnu berayed Jalandhar and Shonkhochur by sleeping with both their wives. Agni became lustful towards the seven wives of Shoptorshi. These obscenities were actually formulated by men of the ancient Vedic era. Because they themselves where lecherous and polygamous, the Gods and Goddesses they ‘created’ turned out to be of the same composition. And that is why religious scriptures in Hinduism are gaoled in lewd and adulterous tales. Priests and saints in those times use to curse you, if you happen to slip up in life by so much as a centimetre. Having cursed you they would go and commit themselves to marriage. Sometimes they’d also be invited by kings to populate their queens with children. Sometimes they would get really animated if a beautiful, vivacious woman crosses their path; and sometimes that excitement would culminate into masturbation. It is claimed that children were born from that if it happened. The births of Augusto, Boshishto and Drona are related examples.
To the ‘Muslim-haters’ who think that Muhammad’s marriage of 20/22 women is a decree punishable by hell, do not forget, Krishna had a ‘wife count’ of 16,100! And they weren’t all even local. Krishna brought many of them from different corners of the world and nurtured them in ’Harem’.
There was a sacrificial ritual which was quite popular during ancient times called the Asshomedh Joggo (sacrifice). Part 22-23 in the Bajshoneyi Shonghita describes that during the Asshomedh sacrifice (horse sacrifice), the chief officiating priest openly engaged in ‘ceremonial’ sexual intercourse with his chief officiating priestess there, all in front of the other attending priests and priestesses. It is said all the other attending priestesses collectively shouted out various moments of that obscene screenplay. All in all, the resulting atmosphere was deliberately created to generate overwhelming sexual tension between the attending men and women. In latter eras, the ceremony was slightly altered with the chief priest switching roles with the sacrificial horse. During the sacrifice, it is said that the chief priestess would rub her genitals against that of the horse. These obscenities are found in abundance inside the Bible too.
It almost seems that all religions ‘tolerate’ women because they have their uses, while they’re simultaneously reluctant to stop their incessant oppression over them. Hindu religion preaches that a woman’s lips are like nectar but their hearts are black and evil, that is why you should taste their lips and put stress on their hearts. And it does not stop there, for there are instructions to use brute force if necessary, to apply that stress. On the Satpath Brahman verse no. 4/4/2/13 says: “Women should be controlled with canes and thunder/lightning, so that she cannot have any claims over her body nor her possessions”; The Brihodaronnok Upanishad has saint Jagyobolko stating, “If a woman does not respond to her husband’s advances at first, the husband shall try and ‘buy her’ with gifts. If even that doesn’t work, the husband is permitted the use of canes to bend his wife to his wishes.” (6/4/7, 1/9/2/14). What’s even more uncanny is there is a verse Islamic law which is similar to that. There are specific guidelines from Allah himself, on when to use blunt force on a woman to bring her under control. It is situated in the Quran, Surah Nisa verse no.34,
“ওয়াল্লা-তি তাখা-ফু-না নুশু-জাহুন্না ফাআ-জিহুন্না ওয়াহজুরু-হুন্না ফি আলমাদা-জিয়ি ওয়াদরিবুহুন।
Which translates to: “If a woman declines to listen to you and rebels against you, try and talk to her first. If that doesn’t work forbid her from coming near your bed. And if that does not resolve things, start beating them.”
Women must pull themselves out of this oppression, out of the dark shadow cast by ancient traditions, religion and religious scriptures. You have to morph yourselves into becoming antibodies against these ‘anti-women’ viruses. There is hope still because a lot of nations are trying to make a stand against these medieval religious practices. But admittedly there are still some ‘virus infected nations’ living in the past. These are places where women are placed on house arrest. Women are not allowed to drive, women are not allowed to work like men, women are told to cover their whole bodies. Sometimes one of them has to be wife to a man with 4 other wives, or sometimes they have to be courtesans inside the Badshah’s (emperor) harem. In places like Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia the ‘Zena’ and ‘Hudud’ laws are used like protective shells by rapists. To prove she had been raped, a woman mostly struggles to find the “four witnesses” she needs. In the end the rapist gets off the hookm, and the women is condemned to the laws of the “Shariah”, because she has committed “Zena”. In many cases, the woman’s parents themselves push her towards death in desperate attempt to protect the “name and status” of their family. It is overwhelming how many “documented” cases like that exist in the world.
Religion, quite simply was created by men. Because no religion in the world has ever aided and abated women in general, it is essential that they come out of the addiction and phobia instilled in them by religion. Religion was crafted by men, for the men, not for the benefit of women.
Begum Rokeya, in her book titled “Amader Obonoti”, had this to say –
“Whenever a woman has tried to come out of the shadows and express herself, she was charged down by people who used religion and its scriptures as a tool to subdue her wishes. That which we did not believe before, we started believing in, after of course religion had its say on the matter. To keep women in the dark, men have created religious scriptures, claimed them to be ‘guideline from God’ and then proceeded to spread religion worldwide. These verses are rules and regulations set forth by men, and nothing else.”

Laughably enough, women are only chasing ‘fool’s gold’ with the demands that they be treated as equals to men, whist, simultaneously maintaining their faith in religion. If they cling on to religion they will only ever be served with the opposite. Because religion does not agree that men and women are equal. It does not care for the progress of women. On the contrary it thinks that women are slaves to it. If only there were more women like Nondini, who simply chose to flip the whole subject of ‘religion’ upside down. If it were possible the world might still be salvageable. The quicker women worldwide stand up to religion the way Nondini has, perhaps we can cure the world of the ‘viruses of belief’ after all.

Terrorism as I’ve seen it…


The word terrorism has been bandied about so much throughout my life I tend to “misuse” the word in a literal sense, whenever I want to express emotions like fear or uncertainty. Same goes for nations as well who try and express depression or failure that way, but tend to repress the disdain they feel normally, so as to not attract too much attention.
I consider myself lucky (or unlucky rather) to have crossed paths with religion, earlier a lot of people of my age…
I’d just started year 5 (‘Panjam’ as they call it in madrasas) for the second time in my life even though I had not failed last year. The place where I used to go was quite a famous one in my locality, the ‘Jameya Madania Islamia Kazir Bazaar Madrasa’ (madrasa is an educational institute, which explicitly stresses on religion and religious related studies).
I sued to live in a hostel. My father wanted me to be a great Alim, well versed in religious knowledge as he aimed to buy a one way ticket for me to heaven. He of course had no faith in the mainstream education system (why I never asked him!).
You must understand, madrasas are basically ran by the tuition fees of those, like me, who study there and from grants all over the world (London included).
Every year an Islamic ‘Jalsa’ (religious congregation who gather to discuss various aspects of Islam) was organized at the madrasa. These ‘Jalsa’ were also part of a very sophisticated technique to earn money as well. The entire town would be inundated with promotional banners and posters, the event would be announced throughout a whole long at times using electronic mikes. On top of that door-to-door money collection made for a celebratory atmosphere altogether.
How old was I? 13, maybe 14? These things seemed so strange to me. Those eye-wateringly colourful posters that I used to read, and that I used to read for other people as well, for boys in my year were not able to read Bengali that well. I used to tell them about the delgates that will be attending from India, Pakistan, Afghanistan at time. They were almost certain to be some celebrity in the worldwide religious community, some maulana, some Muhaddis, some Mujahid, some Oli-e Kamil or the other etc etc…
One fine morning, everyone in the madrasa was ordered to gather around on the madrasa’s courtyard. And then a group of individual bearing whistles on their necks and canes in their hands, started shouting ‘left, right, left, right!’ Naturally the students followed suit and on top of the little p.e. routine, the men started shouting a few rhythmic slogans and ordered us to join them in chorus.
Some of us started whispering to each other in between. What’s going on? What is this? Where did these men come from? What are we doing? And the answer came not long after. Apparently, we were being prepped to pick up and escort an important delegate (an Afghan Mujahid), who is due to arrive at the Sylhet rail station. Now that got me excited. I was going out in an adventure, I will be able to see the station!
Even then I didn’t know that I was about to greet someone with the fearful title of Mujahid. I did not know that our “guest”, was none other than the writer of “Afghan Ronangone Ami Allah ke Dekechi” (which roughly translates to I saw Allah on the Afghan battlefield), principal maulana habibur Rahman (who is infamously known by his nickname ‘bulbuli’). But that isn’t the most distressing part. What’s more distressing is, that he is a returning Mujahid or Jangi (terrorist) from Afghanistan. Since then I’ve read his book. It is filled with descriptions of battlefields and illogical reasoning.
Because I was in my tender years then, that was all I got to experience in terms of terrorism at the Kazi Bazaar Madrasa. I just wished to relive now that I am much more experienced. I shall return to discuss later in my writing.
Now because Kazi Bazaar Madrasa was usually kept busy organizing some meeting or protest rally every day, my father decided I needed a change of scenery and a more intense environment to conduct my studies in. As such my father decided to deport me to Angura Mohammedpur Madrasa.
The madrasa stood in a bit of a remote location in truth. In monsoon seasons, you’d had to board large engine boats to make the one hour and thirty minute long journey across the river Haor, to get to the place. And on dry season, when the water has dried up we used to take what we fondly call ’baby taxis’ in our country, which took about two hours to complete the trip. The madrasa was a quiet, peaceful place situated near the edge of the river. On evenings we used to visit the newly built campus of the madrasa. The new madrasa was set to be built right at the centre of the village on an open field. There were no houses or building in and around it.
And it was there that I came to know a group of men who used practice sword fighting, self-defence and wrestling to protect themselves. I felt a bit awkward at first between their midst, but soon the rigor and infallible enthusiasm of youth took over and I became a regular at their group. I started requesting them to teach me some of their skills. But they use to decline it. Saying I was too young and yet there were people below my year, but older than me used to go there and receive those lesson. I used follow them closely and as such inevitably, I began picking up a thing or two on sword fighting myself. A few months later I had to leave the place completely.
I was sent to Fatehpur Alia Madrasa this time. Untouched by politics, this madrasa was situated inside a densely populated village. It was ran by the family of a priest. It wasn’t exactly a hotbed for Shibir activities, but there were some low key operations conducted for sure. There were tutors who were sentimental towards the Awami league and many were sympathetic towards Shibir too.
One night, during Esha prayers, a group of well-built men joined us in Jamaat (the rows formed when ‘Namaaz’ or Islamic prayers are conducted a big group). One of our seniors requested some of those men to remain behind and share their stories. I wasn’t invited, so I had to leave. But decided to wait up for my senior, who’d invited them to stay behind, eager to learn what those men had to say. Eventually they came in the shadows and left in shadow as well, departing sometime around 11 o’clock in the night. When they’d gone my senior brother came in and I asked him. What he said that night didn’t shock me or make my blood curl. Instead I felt those men were nothing but fools. They’d said,
Well they said quite a few things, some correct, some contentious. They are men who toil day and night in order to ‘gain strength’, so that they can displace the current regime in power. In order to do that, they intend nto recruit members from all madrasa and colleges in the country, and then send them to Takrir (spiritual training camp).
..my senior brother further offered, they have little chance of being successful, they are not organized, they have no faith or consistency in terms of leadership…
I didn’t fully understand his word back then, but I felt excited nonetheless…they couldn’t care less about the Awami League, BNP or Jamaat, all they want is Jihad. But what I couldn’t understand was why they wanted Jihad. Jihad against whom? My senior brother used to laugh and tell me, you won’t understand this greed, this lust for it now, perhaps when you’re older…
Once I’d finished Dakhil at that place, I enrolled into college. Those were hard times for me, periods of difficult transitions. I was leading two lives with one body. There, I met a group of boys who were, how do I say it? Different. In every way possible. They were polite, the way they spoke and their etiquettes were exemplary, but they were keen to isolate themselves from others. They came and went as they pleased. Sometimes they used to say these things, these sort of vague and dreamy things. This madrasa was placed close to the Bondor Bazaar library and was a school/college hybrid. Those boys, were in charge of quoting and re-quoting the Quran incessantly all day every day, so that the madrasa students understand that for them Jihad is Faraj (compulsory). They were adamant to make them understand that it will most certainly be a part of their lives. I was disenchanted, left with a bad taste in my mouth. This was not kind of life I’d imagined for myself, so I desperately sought to break this coarse and seemingly impenetrable shell of religious obsession. It was perhaps good that I had enough greed to motivate me, perhaps which is why this kind of life couldn’t attract me. So one day I just disappeared from their midst…
A few years later, in the month of Ramadan, I visited this tutor in Shekh Ghat who was studying for an honours degree and was quite skilled with a computer. His parents adored him drawing him in every conversation they have with people. So, while we were having Iftaar (the feast Muslims have after breaking fast) that day, my tutor decided to tell us about this new ‘project’ he was working on. It involved things like saying ‘I’m Allah’s servant’ day and night or before sleep, staying fit and exercising (the man also had a black belt!) and a lot of other random things…
But what shocked me was this tutor of mine one day, tried to force someone very dear to me, to join him ‘in the great cause of Islam’, in an Islamic training camp. It is understandable that my tutor was willing to all this and then have the audacity to force someone to do it, because he was a very religiously active man and must’ve been brought up with the slogan ‘Jihad is Faraj’ induced into his brain cells. But the man he tried to entice would not give in, perhaps because he wasn’t as adventurous. Perhaps because it looked bad for the head of a middle class family to be that rebellious in nature or perhaps simply, he did not believe on this train of thought, in the slightest.
This all happened during a time when Bangladesh wasn’t as advanced in terms modern thoughts and ideas or information technology and the like. Not nearly enough anyway to offer someone a lot of choices to determine what’s in front of him before ‘taking the proverbial leap’… I personally like to call them the ‘sceptic civilization’. They were prone to believe everything and nothing, whilst being suspicious of everything!...Religious organizations and influential individuals had an indomitable stranglehold on the society and sort of enforced people to accept them without much need for conviction.
Madrasa education was as struggling and was being fast left behind. Madrasa students were depressed and slowly turning into an isolated community, separate from those of mainstream education. Their desire to be noticed, to garner the attention of the international community prompted something which would readjust the course of history forever. For the first time in school, colleges and madrasas, terrorism finally took off…
There was a boy whose name was Elias and he used to come in from Hobigonj. Al his words seemed to be based around Hasan Al Banna (an Islamic rebel in Egypt).
He used to live quite near my locality, in the Mosque quarters of C&B colony. He used to teach Arabic to children in and around the area. He was very friendly with local youth. When I first met him we talked about the various financial and personal problems he was going through. After we’d acquainted each other for a few more days, one evening he invited me to join him in the student quarters of the Alia madrasa. I was in the process of buying some medicine for my father and on my return, Elias asked me to come and meet this senior brother of his.
That ‘senior’ was a man named Lokman ahmed. He told me about the deplorable state of Muslims in Palestine, Chechnia, Bosnuia and Kashmir. He said that Bangladesh will become like that one day. India will back us into a corner and subjugate us so much, that we will forget we were even Muslims.
I stopped him in the middle of his monologue and asked him, “What do you want?”
He got irritated but chose to hide it by rambling on, “We have to read, we have to know and we have to protect our Muslim brothers and go into Jihad.” Then he recited a few verses from the Quran. He then informed me like Namaz, Jihad was Faraj as well. I didn’t let him elongate these last wwords even more. I left for home.
A few days later I couldn’t see Elias around anymore. I heard later that he had left for Chittagong.
What’s noticeable, is how easily this fanaticism on Jihad has slowly crept out of the shadows of schools and colleges and crossed the university threshold as well.
There was another young man hailing from Kushtia University, that I had been introduced to by a friend. His name was Islam Uddin and he originate from Chatak Bari. You’d find him anywhere in the city of Sylhet. His ability to make speech was charismatic, he was a skilled communicator in Bengali, Arabic and even English. Whenever I used to meet he’d never let me leave, not before he’d treated me to a snack or a drink at least. And he used to obsess about just the one thing. He believed the youth have to ‘take action’. Youth is Allah’s greatest gift.
One day he asked me to meet him. We linked in the Pir Mohaala Mosque quarters and then travelled to the old Kazir Bazaar Madrasa campus. There were about 20 or thirty odd people already present there. Most of the were Punjabi-clad (is an upper garment for men originating in South Asia, with regional variations of form) young men.
Maulana Atiqur Rahman (the younger brother of Principal Habibur Rahman), maulana Momshad, abdul Kayyum Jallali (disciple of Habibur Rahman) in amongst other delegates were present. One by one they delivered speeches. During that time, at that moment I was beleaguered by so much oppression against Muslims. Why is it like that I thought? I felt compelled to burn and destroy everything in sight!!!
A week later Islam Uddin invited me again. I chose not to attend that time.
Years passed. I left college. Poverty and need kept me busy. I cut a distant figure amongst my classmates.
Maybe my fate would have turned out different if I’d not met Ahsan Karim and Farukh shekh. One pushed me towards mythical or ‘un-Islamic’ studies, while the other encouraged me to join the cause of a student organized movement called ‘Moitri’.

Because we live in the same city, sometimes I used to cross paths with those I knew before. Out of eye-contact sometimes we’d approach each other and make small talk. Slowly I started seeing them feature regularly in my battle to establish logic. And I waged that war as long as I could, up until the time I was forced to leave Sylhet.

Friday 18 March 2016

ধর্ম আছে বলেই বঞ্চিতদের দীর্ঘ সারি আজও রয়ে গেছে

ভারতের জওহার লাল নেহরু বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়ে ছাত্রগণ আন্দোলন করছেন, এই আন্দোলনের বিপক্ষে উগ্র হিন্দুত্ববাদী দল শিব সেনা, বজরঙ্গি দল ও বিজেপি অবস্থান নিয়েছে। 

কংগ্রেস এই আন্দোলনের ফল ঝুলিতে ভরতে মাঠে নেমেছে। সব কিছু থেকেই কিছু না কিছু শেখার আছে, এই আন্দোলনকে ঘিরে যে সব প্রচার হচ্ছে তা আমায় একটি বড় সবক দিয়ে গেছে, বিজেপির এম এল এ জ্ঞান দেব আহুজা (শাইনি আহুজার জেনেটিক্যাল বাপ নয়) এমন কিছু জ্ঞান গর্ব স্রাব প্রসব করেছেন যা আমায় বাংলাদেশে গণজাগরণ মঞ্চ শুরু হবার পর এর বিরোধীদের মুখ থেকেও শুনা স্রাব কে মনে করিয়ে দেয়। 

এই ধরনের আন্দলোনের ক্ষেত্রে এই ধরনের নোংরা প্রচারণা হচ্ছে একটা প্রচলিত ট্রেন্ড বিশেষ করে উপমহাদেশের এই ধরনের সেমি বিল্পবিক একটা রাইজিং এ তো বটেই। সেটা বাংলাদেশ হোক কিংবা কলোম্বো কিংবা নেপাল অথবা থিম্পু। সবখানেই।

এর কারন খুঁজতে গেলে কিন্তু ধর্মের প্রভাব একটা বড় ফ্যাক্টর। কি সেই ফ্যাক্টর? ফ্যাক্টর হচ্ছে নৈতিকতা এবং যে অদ্ভুত নৈতিকতা ধর্ম থেকে উৎসারিত। আপনার পাশে মদের বোতল নিয়ে একটা ছবি রয়েছে, তাহলে আপনি বড় খারাপ মানুষ কিংবা আপনি আন্দলোন করছেন আর সেখানে পড়ে রয়েছে কন্ডমের প্যাকেট, তাহলে আপনি বা আপনারা সবাই খারাপ। এই যে স্টেরিও টাইপ ও কনভেনশনাল চিন্তার প্যাটার্ন এগুলো ধর্মের আউটকাম। সুতরাং আমাদের জীবনে যে কোনো কর্মকান্ডেই এই ধর্ম একটা বড় বাগড়া হয়ে দেখা দেয় এটি সন্দেহ নেই। যে কোনো আন্দোলন, সংগ্রাম, দাবী আদায়ের সবা সবখানেই আপনি জাস্ট এই উপমহাদেশে ঢুকিয়ে দেন যে এটা হিন্দুদের আন্দোলন ব্যাস মুসলমানরা একাট্টা হয়ে মূল দাবী ফেলে মারামারিতে বসে যাবে, খাবার আদায়ের আন্দলনে আপনি জাস্ট বলেন এটা নাস্তিকদের আন্দোলন, ব্যাস দেখবেন সব শেষ নিমিষেই। প্রমাণীত হয়ে উঠবেন যে আপনি মূলত একজন খারাপ ব্যাক্তি কিংবা আপনারা।

Wednesday 16 March 2016

Why I’m not enlightened by religious tomes…Part-2

The Bible is perhaps is the most publicized, the most sponsored and also probably the most discussed and consequently criticized religious book in the world today. The 14th century Protestants made the Bible readily accessible for people of all castes and systems, for the first time. Before that, the commoners were only able to learn the Bible in snippets from Church priests, whilst it was easily accessible for the upper class society.
Before we determine whether the Bible is ‘enlightening’ or not, it is necessary that we search for the reasons the Bible was claimed to be ‘enlightening’ in the first place.
I remember watching hawkers in front of my house or in the bazaar, use manual weight balancing machines to buy and sell an assortment of products ranging from vegetables, meat to a stash of unwanted paper. There was a belief amongst the people that the weight balancers used during those exchanges, were dubious and/or had faults in them. As such they used to hover over the hawkers while they sold or bought goods from them…
I myself have caught many of these unscrupulous traders in my time. The secret was in the angle they held the weight balance, and of course the wooden or steel bar attached with them. After I grew up a bit, unusually enough, whenever I saw weight balancers from then on, it reminded me of the Cross. And then once I’d grown up enough, the false myths in the world surrounding the Cross, shocked me to the core. As such my interest in Isa (Jesus), prompted my mission to extract the black and white truth, from what is ‘believed’ to be the truth.
Let us now search for that very public speech (and completely untrue), which has festered as the notion of belief amongst people for generations. I’m of course referring to the birth of Isa or Jesus, his prophecy and his resurrection for recognizing Islam…
The prophecy of the resurrection Jesus is of paramount importance to Islam and Muslims and to me, if I were to expose the ultimate truth about Islam. Jesus Christ is the key.
If we start from the beginning of the beginning,
If we analyse the 3 possible ways Mother Mary or Mariam could have conceived Jesus, we’ll find,
1)      She got pregnant after having sex with someone who had her full consent.
2)      She was raped and then caused to become pregnant.
3)      It was down to some inexplicable or unnatural phenomenon. Or maybe, it was a ‘surrogate birth’, the likes of which are regular done in modern medical science. Perhaps she simply discovered a technique thousand years quicker than the ones who discovered it a thousand years later.
We think that Jesus Christ cannot be held culpable or be criticized in any way or in any scenario. This begs the question, who can be blamed then… for that we need to go back a bit.
Since the Jews are blamed for nailing Jesus to the Cross and killing him, it is safe to assume some of us may not buy into their perspectives. As such, I shall rely on the findings of the Bible and the Quran to supplement my case. And besides, I have the added advantage of growing up in a Muslim family and learn the Islamic perspective on Jesus Christ or prophet Isa, as he is known there.
The Quran began to be advertised 600 years after the crucifixion of Christ. The Quran does indeed discuss the birth of Jesus or Isa and his inexplicable powers and of course of his mysterious birth.
Chapter 3, verse no. 35 to 41 describes the birth of Jesus’s mother,
( 35 )   [Mention, O Muhammad], when the wife of 'Imran said, "My Lord, indeed I have pledged to You what is in my womb, consecrated [for Your service], so accept this from me. Indeed, You are the Hearing, the Knowing."
( 36 )   But when she delivered her, she said, "My Lord, I have delivered a female." And Allah was most knowing of what she delivered, "And the male is not like the female. And I have named her Mary, and I seek refuge for her in You and [for] her descendants from Satan, the expelled [from the mercy of Allah]."
( 37 )   So her Lord accepted her with good acceptance and caused her to grow in a good manner and put her in the care of Zechariah. Every time Zechariah entered upon her in the prayer chamber, he found with her provision. He said, "O Mary, from where is this [coming] to you?" She said, "It is from Allah. Indeed, Allah provides for whom He wills without account."
( 38 )   At that, Zechariah called upon his Lord, saying, "My Lord, grant me from Yourself a good offspring. Indeed, You are the Hearer of supplication."
( 39 )   So the angels called him while he was standing in prayer in the chamber, "Indeed, Allah gives you good tidings of John, confirming a word from Allah and [who will be] honorable, abstaining [from women], and a prophet from among the righteous."
( 40 )   He said, "My Lord, how will I have a boy when I have reached old age and my wife is barren?" The angel said, "Such is Allah; He does what He wills."
( 41 )   He said, "My Lord, make for me a sign." He Said, "Your sign is that you will not [be able to] speak to the people for three days except by gesture. And remember your Lord much and exalt [Him with praise] in the evening and the morning."
Readers, after Mariam was born, her mother vowed to pledge her to Allah and his ways. Now, if she cannot keep Mariam to herself, who will take care of her? On one side was the concern for the girl’s future and on one side was the promise made to Allah. This instigated a society wide conflict between who will take care of the girl and between those who think the original promise should be kept.
Eventually, to honour all opinions, a lottery system was devised, to elect a caretaker for Mariam. The potential candidates will have to write their names on a piece of paper with a pen and throw them both against the waves created by running water. The person, whose pen will ride the waves back to where it was thrown from, will be nominated as Mariam’s caretaker.
As it happened, Zachariah, Mariam’s uncle, won the lottery. Thus she was kept at the temple which was ran by Zachariah. Chapter 3, verse no.42-43 refers to this story,
( 42 )   And [mention] when the angels said, "O Mary, indeed Allah has chosen you and purified you and chosen you above the women of the worlds.
( 43 )   O Mary, be devoutly obedient to your Lord and prostrate and bow with those who bow [in prayer]."
( 44 )   That is from the news of the unseen which We reveal to you, [O Muhammad]. And you were not with them when they cast their pens as to which of them should be responsible for Mary. Nor were you with them when they disputed.
( 45 )   [And mention] when the angels said, "O Mary, indeed Allah gives you good tidings of a word from Him, whose name will be the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary - distinguished in this world and the Hereafter and among those brought near [to Allah].
( 46 )   He will speak to the people in the cradle and in maturity and will be of the righteous."
( 47 )   She said, "My Lord, how will I have a child when no man has touched me?" [The angel] said, "Such is Allah; He creates what He wills. When He decrees a matter, He only says to it, 'Be,' and it is.
( 48 )   And He will teach him writing and wisdom and the Torah and the Gospel
( 49 )   And [make him] a messenger to the Children of Israel, [who will say], 'Indeed I have come to you with a sign from your Lord in that I design for you from clay [that which is] like the form of a bird, then I breathe into it and it becomes a bird by permission of Allah. And I cure the blind and the leper, and I give life to the dead - by permission of Allah. And I inform you of what you eat and what you store in your houses. Indeed in that is a sign for you, if you are believers.
( 50 )   And [I have come] confirming what was before me of the Torah and to make lawful for you some of what was forbidden to you. And I have come to you with a sign from your Lord, so fear Allah and obey me.
( 51 )   Indeed, Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is the straight path."
( 52 )   But when Jesus felt [persistence in] disbelief from them, he said, "Who are my supporters for [the cause of] Allah?" The disciples said, "We are supporters for Allah. We have believed in Allah and testify that we are Muslims [submitting to Him].
( 53 )   Our Lord, we have believed in what You revealed and have followed the messenger Jesus, so register us among the witnesses [to truth]."
Chapter 19, verse no. 2-15 of the Quran also discusses the story. But there are a few mentions of Yahiya in there as well.
( 2 )   [This is] a mention of the mercy of your Lord to His servant Zechariah
( 3 )   When he called to his Lord a private supplication.
( 4 )   He said, "My Lord, indeed my bones have weakened, and my head has filled with white, and never have I been in my supplication to You, my Lord, unhappy.
( 5 )   And indeed, I fear the successors after me, and my wife has been barren, so give me from Yourself an heir
( 6 )   Who will inherit me and inherit from the family of Jacob. And make him, my Lord, pleasing [to You]."
( 7 )   [He was told], "O Zechariah, indeed We give you good tidings of a boy whose name will be John. We have not assigned to any before [this] name."
( 8 )   He said, "My Lord, how will I have a boy when my wife has been barren and I have reached extreme old age?"
( 9 )   [An angel] said, "Thus [it will be]; your Lord says, 'It is easy for Me, for I created you before, while you were nothing.' "
( 10 )   [Zechariah] said, "My Lord, make for me a sign." He said, "Your sign is that you will not speak to the people for three nights, [being] sound."
( 11 )   So he came out to his people from the prayer chamber and signaled to them to exalt [Allah] in the morning and afternoon.
( 12 )   [Allah] said, "O John, take the Scripture with determination." And We gave him judgement [while yet] a boy
( 13 )   And affection from Us and purity, and he was fearing of Allah
( 14 )   And dutiful to his parents, and he was not a disobedient tyrant.
( 15 )   And peace be upon him the day he was born and the day he dies and the day he is raised alive.
( 16 )   And mention, [O Muhammad], in the Book [the story of] Mary, when she withdrew from her family to a place toward the east.
( 17 )   And she took, in seclusion from them, a screen. Then We sent to her Our Angel, and he represented himself to her as a well-proportioned man.
( 18 )   She said, "Indeed, I seek refuge in the Most Merciful from you, [so leave me], if you should be fearing of Allah."
( 19 )   He said, "I am only the messenger of your Lord to give you [news of] a pure boy."

There are two instances where the Quran mentions Jesus’s birth. They are on chapter 3, verse no. 42-53.
( 16 )   And mention, [O Muhammad], in the Book [the story of] Mary, when she withdrew from her family to a place toward the east.
( 17 )   And she took, in seclusion from them, a screen. Then We sent to her Our Angel, and he represented himself to her as a well-proportioned man.
( 18 )   She said, "Indeed, I seek refuge in the Most Merciful from you, [so leave me], if you should be fearing of Allah."
( 19 )   He said, "I am only the messenger of your Lord to give you [news of] a pure boy."
( 20 )   She said, "How can I have a boy while no man has touched me and I have not been unchaste?"
( 21 )   He said, "Thus [it will be]; your Lord says, 'It is easy for Me, and We will make him a sign to the people and a mercy from Us. And it is a matter [already] decreed.' "
( 22 )   So she conceived him, and she withdrew with him to a remote place.
( 23 )   And the pains of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a palm tree. She said, "Oh, I wish I had died before this and was in oblivion, forgotten."
( 24 )   But he called her from below her, "Do not grieve; your Lord has provided beneath you a stream.
( 25 )   And shake toward you the trunk of the palm tree; it will drop upon you ripe, fresh dates.
( 26 )   So eat and drink and be contented. And if you see from among humanity anyone, say, 'Indeed, I have vowed to the Most Merciful abstention, so I will not speak today to [any] man.' "
( 27 )   Then she brought him to her people, carrying him. They said, "O Mary, you have certainly done a thing unprecedented.
( 28 )   O sister of Aaron, your father was not a man of evil, nor was your mother unchaste."
( 29 )   So she pointed to him. They said, "How can we speak to one who is in the cradle a child?"
( 30 )   [Jesus] said, "Indeed, I am the servant of Allah. He has given me the Scripture and made me a prophet.
( 31 )   And He has made me blessed wherever I am and has enjoined upon me prayer and zakah as long as I remain alive
( 32 )   And [made me] dutiful to my mother, and He has not made me a wretched tyrant.
( 33 )   And peace is on me the day I was born and the day I will die and the day I am raised alive."
( 34 )   That is Jesus, the son of Mary - the word of truth about which they are in dispute.
( 35 )   It is not [befitting] for Allah to take a son; exalted is He! When He decrees an affair, He only says to it, "Be," and it is.
( 36 )   [Jesus said], "And indeed, Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is a straight path."

And chapter-23 and verse no.50 talks about Jesus’s birthplace,
( 50 )   And We made the son of Mary and his mother a sign and sheltered them within a high ground having level [areas] and flowing water.
Up until now we have read0 excerpts from the Quran discussing Jesus’s birth, that of his mother Mariam’s and of their lives afterwards. But for the sake of humanity, there are some questions that still need to be answered…
Once Mariam came of age, her mother Hanna Binte Fakuj had her transferred permanently to the house of the Lord, as promised.
Now, if should we stop and debate who should be the caretaker of Mariam there, we might want to consider the following couple of things,
1)      It may be an act of virtue to take care of Mariam or
2)      She might get into trouble from time to time, who then will partner her?
It is easy enough to assume what kind of ‘trouble’ a woman might get into. inside a male dominated society. We can compare the above mentioned thoughts side by side. After he’d won Mariam’s guardianship amongst intense competition, we learned from the Quran that Zachariah taught religion to Mariam and also providing for her.
Zachariah was the only person who had legal or approved access to Mariam.
We must be familiar with the sacrificial practices in amongst our society. Cows or buffalooes are sacrificed ‘in the name of the Lord’. Nobody necessary ‘kills’ the animal, or drinks the milk from the animal. There were similar practices in Ancient Indian civilizations and in amongst ancient Arab a person as well, as Prophet Muhammad testifies in his Hadith.
Now, just to be clear, I am not in the process of comparing Mariam to animals, but individuals who undergo oblation, are definitely sacred to most people. So let us come back and ask again, how didd Mariam actually become pregnant?
Almost certainly Zachariah’s name will pop up and why not? Mariam was young and beautiful (an opinion derived from Jesus’s own words). Zachariah had unrestricted access to Mariam which only further strengthens the theory that they could have had sexual intercourse, and Mariam must’ve have gotten pregnant as a result. For those who may argue that he was old, I’d like to refer them to the fact that he gave birth to Yahiya at about the same time. The above mentioned verses of the Quran taken from chapter 3 verse no. 42-53, is documented proof of that. Now if we take Zachariah’s longings for a son and cross reference them with the descriptions in the Quran, who will find it in their heart to believe that Mariam, a down to earth and dedicated to God, could ever be corruptible?
So if we omit Zachariah name from the list of Jesus’s probable father, we have to assume that someone from the community, someone with bad and/or perverted intentions, chose to defile Mariam and make her pregnant. It could have happened with or without Mariam’s consent. If we read Zachariah’s testimony, we’ll find,
Whenever Zachariah used to visit her, he would find her room laden with food and drinks. He would then exclaim, “Oh Mariam! Where did find get all this?” and Mariam would reply, “Allah gave them to me” (chapter 3, verse no.42-53)…
Zachariah was Mariam’s only link to the outside world. He used to bring her food and clothes. Those of us who seek to explain an events or phenomenon which goes against the perceptions of logic or reason, refuse to validate that by some alternate ‘supernatural’ theory. As such the dubious practices of people reflected in the irregularities in Mariam’s story, is proof enough that Zachariah was the only person who saw and visited her on a daily basis. And that is what led him to question Mariam about the food and water she receives on top the provisions he allocates her. Even if I admit that it was God who provided all that food to Mariam, why was it that she didn’t even bother asking the name of the bearer of all these delicacies? And if God bestowed them to her straight from the heavens, why does he refrain from providing food to the millions and millions of desperately hungry and malnourished people in the world today?
The community which decided Mariam’s fate via that lottery, had this to say once Mariam came back to them with her son,
“Oh Mariam, what have you done? Young lass! Neither your mother nor your father were of such unsavoury character.”
Based on the verses of the Quran, we can conclude that Zachariah’s religious repertoire or that it was the ’work of angels’, were explanations deemed both dubious and contentious by the people and as such, was not enough to cover up Zachariah’s illicit deed. But the sad truth is millions of people today believe in this repulsive truth.
It is worth noting that to cover up what he’d done, Zachariah immediately shipped Mariam out from his temple, after he learned that she had become pregnant. The Quran testifies to that as well.
Funny thing is, Hindu mythology is laced with similarly laughable tales of ‘supernatural births’ such as that of Korno. Meanwhile in Greek mythology, the meritless story of the birth of Hercules has a few telling similarities with that of Jesus’s. But the real question is how could Muslims adopt such a story?
It is important to remember that, the hostilities towards Jews and maintaining fragile economic and diplomatic relations with them, was the biggest challenge that faced the post-Hijrat (migration) Muslims. As such the support of lower caste people, slaves and the Christian community was vital for Muslims. And that is why Isa is mentioned in the Quran so many times in comparison to other prophets.
To establish the tale of Meraj, a refined version of Isa’s biography has been published in the Quran, based on the story of his ‘appearance’ and the evidence gathered from the Gospels. Besides that, according to 70 Sahih Hadith (meaning rightful edicts or claimed to be so anyway), Isa is professed to return, which should be a comfortable transition for Christians.  But when it will be Muslims who will see their powers grow, they will proclaim that Jesus is the ‘Ummat’ (descendent) of Mohammed. Surah Azab in the Quran, chapter 33, verse no. 40 says,
( 40 )   Muhammad is not the father of [any] one of your men, but [he is] the Messenger of Allah and last of the prophets. And ever is Allah, of all things, Knowing.
Besides that, Surah Al-Maeda, chapter 5, verse no. 3 draws an official conclusion to the story which claims, Isa will come to the world again to distract all Christians,
( 3 )   Prohibited to you are dead animals, blood, the flesh of swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah, and [those animals] killed by strangling or by a violent blow or by a head-long fall or by the goring of horns, and those from which a wild animal has eaten, except what you [are able to] slaughter [before its death], and those which are sacrificed on stone altars, and [prohibited is] that you seek decision through divining arrows. That is grave disobedience. This day those who disbelieve have despaired of [defeating] your religion; so fear them not, but fear Me. This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion. But whoever is forced by severe hunger with no inclination to sin - then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.
When Isa reached maturity and started preaching, the then society’s opinion of his actions are documented in chapter 61, verse no.14,
( 14 )   O you who have believed, be supporters of Allah, as when Jesus, the son of Mary, said to the disciples, "Who are my supporters for Allah?" The disciples said, "We are supporters of Allah." And a faction of the Children of Israel believed and a faction disbelieved. So We supported those who believed against their enemy, and they became dominant
Chapter 5 verse no.111 to 115 has,
( 111 )   And [remember] when I inspired to the disciples, "Believe in Me and in My messenger Jesus." They said, "We have believed, so bear witness that indeed we are Muslims [in submission to Allah]."
( 112 )   [And remember] when the disciples said, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, can your Lord send down to us a table [spread with food] from the heaven? [Jesus] said," Fear Allah, if you should be believers."
( 113 )   They said, "We wish to eat from it and let our hearts be reassured and know that you have been truthful to us and be among its witnesses."
( 114 )   Said Jesus, the son of Mary, "O Allah, our Lord, send down to us a table [spread with food] from the heaven to be for us a festival for the first of us and the last of us and a sign from You. And provide for us, and You are the best of providers."
( 115 )   Allah said, "Indeed, I will send it down to you, but whoever disbelieves afterwards from among you - then indeed will I punish him with a punishment by which I have not punished anyone among the worlds."

Question is, if someone had been preaching straight after his birth and right from the get go, why would the commoners not believe him when he’d reached maturity?
Obviously people chose react to what happened with Mariam by rejecting Jesus. According to the Quran, the commoners had this to say, chapter 3 verse no. 42-53,
( 42 )   And [mention] when the angels said, "O Mary, indeed Allah has chosen you and purified you and chosen you above the women of the worlds.
( 43 )   O Mary, be devoutly obedient to your Lord and prostrate and bow with those who bow [in prayer]."
( 44 )   That is from the news of the unseen which We reveal to you, [O Muhammad]. And you were not with them when they cast their pens as to which of them should be responsible for Mary. Nor were you with them when they disputed.
( 45 )   [And mention] when the angels said, "O Mary, indeed Allah gives you good tidings of a word from Him, whose name will be the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary - distinguished in this world and the Hereafter and among those brought near [to Allah].
( 46 )   He will speak to the people in the cradle and in maturity and will be of the righteous."
( 47 )   She said, "My Lord, how will I have a child when no man has touched me?" [The angel] said, "Such is Allah; He creates what He wills. When He decrees a matter, He only says to it, 'Be,' and it is.
( 48 )   And He will teach him writing and wisdom and the Torah and the Gospel
( 49 )   And [make him] a messenger to the Children of Israel, [who will say], 'Indeed I have come to you with a sign from your Lord in that I design for you from clay [that which is] like the form of a bird, then I breathe into it and it becomes a bird by permission of Allah. And I cure the blind and the leper, and I give life to the dead - by permission of Allah. And I inform you of what you eat and what you store in your houses. Indeed in that is a sign for you, if you are believers.
( 50 )   And [I have come] confirming what was before me of the Torah and to make lawful for you some of what was forbidden to you. And I have come to you with a sign from your Lord, so fear Allah and obey me.
( 51 )   Indeed, Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is the straight path."
( 52 )   But when Jesus felt [persistence in] disbelief from them, he said, "Who are my supporters for [the cause of] Allah?" The disciples said, "We are supporters for Allah. We have believed in Allah and testify that we are Muslims [submitting to Him].
( 53 )   Our Lord, we have believed in what You revealed and have followed the messenger Jesus, so register us among the witnesses [to truth]."

It is clear as day that the people remembered what happened with Mariam and as a consequence, chose to reject Isa’s teachings.